Cunningham v. Danville Circuit Court, No. 7:2012cv00357 - Document 10 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 09/28/2012. (kab)

Download PDF
I THE UNI N TED STATE S D I STRI T C O U R T C FO R T H E W ESTER N D ISTR I T O F V IR G IN I C A R O A NO K E DIV ISIO N JA M ES E.CU NN I G H AM , N CA SE N O .7: 2CV 00357 1 CL ERK8 OFFI t.:.D@ OQURT CE J ST. AT ROANOKE) A V FIED L 0CT 2 l2 1 22 auLA c. l DUDL CL EM ERK B ; g () Y <x . ? m Pl ntf , ai if cu. M EM O R AN DU M O PIN IO N VS. D AN V I LLE CIR CU IT C O U R T, By: Jam es C .T urk Seni U nied St es D i ri Judge or t at st ct D ef endant . J m e E. a s Cunni ngha ,a V igi a i a e pr e di pr K ,f l d t s c vi r g s a ton m r ni nm t oc e ng o ie hi i l i ht c i purua t 42U. C.j 1 3, l ngt tt defnda ,heDa leCic tCour,vi ae hi s nt o S. 98 alegi ha he e ntt nvil r ui t oltd s c tt tonalr g sr a e t hi bond.U pon r vi w oft r co d, he cour fndst tt ons iu i i ht el t d o s e e he e r t t i ha he a ton m us be s m a iy di m i s d. ci t um r l s s e Cunni m a l est ton J 6,201 t D a le Cic tCour r voked hi bo on ngha leg ha une 2, he nvil r ui te s nd a c r ofbei dnz i publc des t t f c t the ha notvi a e bond c tons H e ha ge ng nk n i , pie he a t ha d ol t d ondii . al o a s r st tt Cour e r i f lng t s ta new bond. A sr le ,Cunni m s ks s s e t ha he t r ed n aii o e ei f ngha ee r ns a e e ofhi bond and c pe a i f hi i a ce a i ei t t m nt s om ns ton or s nc r r ton. The c ti r qui e t di m i sa ac i orcl i tl d by a pr s raga ns a our s e r d o s s ny ton am ie i one i t go r e a e iy orof i e i t c tde e m i st ac i n orc a m i f i o , a i i , ve nm nt l ntt f c r f he our t r ne he t o l i s rvol us m lc ous o fist saeacam o whc r le ma b g a td 2 U. C. 1 5 b () I i n w wel r al o tt li n ih eif y e rn e . 8 S. j 91 A( )1 . t s o l s tldt tasaecn bes dunde j1 ete ha tt nnot ue r 983.W ilv. ihi nDe tofStt Polce 491 l M c ga p' ae i , U. 58,71(1 )(tNlihe aStt norisofi asaci i t rofki c pa ii a e S. 989 tg et r ae t tcil tng n hei t al a ctes r t rons unde j1 3. Thi l l a i toStt orgove ntle ii t tae pe s ' r 98 ' 3. s ' e pples ç aes u t mme a nttes ha r c i r d t r s oft St t f El ve h Am e e pu pos . I a 70. ons de e a m he a e' or e nt ndm nt r es ' d. t ' The onl de e ntt tCunni ha s i t D mw il Ci c tCour . B e a e t y f nda ha ng m ues s he le r ui t c us he Cic tCour i pr pe l c i r a a m oft Com m onw e 1h ofV igi a,i cn r ui t s o ry ons de ed n r he at r ni t nnotbe s d ue unde j1 3.I r 98 d. Fo t er a o ssae ,h c u t imis sCu nng a sc mpan wih u p eudc , r h e s n ttd te o r ds se n i h m' o lit t o t rj ie purua t j1 5A( ( ) asl lyfi ous TheClr i die tdt s c e oft s s nt o 91 b)1, egal rvol . ek s r ce o end opis hi m e or ndum opi on a ac om pa ng f na or rt pl n i f m a ni nd c nyi i l de o ai t f . E ER:T i Zsv a o S pe e, 0 2 NT hs - y f etmbr2 1. J Se o U nie St t D i ti t dge ni t d a es s r c

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.