Lee v. Beaudreault et al, No. 7:2011cv00288 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 07/25/2011. (kab)

Download PDF
' FRK' OFFI U. DI X UA F J S CE S. SX AT ROANOKE, A V FI LFD JUL 25 2 1 21 I TH E U N I N TED STATES DI STRI T C O U RT C FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STRI T O F V I G I A C R NI R O A N O K E D I ISIO N V SH A UN T' TEN ELL LEE , E Pl ntif, ai f V. C/ BEAUDREAULT, 1 , O # D e e nt . f nda s J A G. ULI BK DEPU A, ' CLERK Y CLERK Ci lA c i N o.7: v00288 vi t on 11c ) ) ) ) ) ) ) M EM O R AN D UM O PI O N NI By:Sam ue G . is l W l on U ni e St t s Di t ctJudge t d a e s ri Sha ' Te l Lee a Vigi a i t pr e ng pr K ,fl d t s c vi rght a ton unte nel , r ni nma e oce di o ie hi i l i s ci puruan t 42U. C.j 1 s e ng a uns iid a s to S. 983 e ki n pecfe mountofdamage .The c tlndst t s our ha, des t bei gi n t opporuniy t a e he c pl i , Le ha not s a ed a c a m upon pie ng ve he t t o m nd r om a nt e s tt li whih rle may be g a ed a t rf e,dimis s t s aci p'rua t 28 U. C.j c eif r nt nd, heeor s se hi ton u s nt o S. 1 5( ( ( (i. 91 e)2)B)i) Le al ge t t s a o he i ae had a ve ba dia ee e t a a s e le s ha he nd t r nm t s r l s gr m n nd t ome poi nt a he i t çgrbbed ( eJa ound g r ne 'r s tng i ( oke s n on bot sdesof not r nmae s a Le r he ) ck,' euli n t n ki br h i g r nec ' Le doe notalget ta oft defnda sweeprs ntwhe t salge atc hej k.' e s le ha ny he e nt r e e n hi le d ta k oc n'd a s doe nota l e t ta oft de e nt ha r s t bele t tt s i a e cu e nd he s leg ha ny he f nda s d ea on o i ve ha hi nm t m i ta tc he . Le a l s t ts r se medialte t e ,s c fcal a t tnuss , gh ta k r e lege ha he eque t d c r am nt pe ii ly ea hot butde pie beng gi t opporuniy t n e he c s t i ven he t t o m nd r ompl i ,s doe notsa e whehe or ant he s tt t r nots r c ve a me c team e . he e ei d ny dial r t nt lI. To sae a ca m f r r i unde j1 tt li o elef r 983,a pl ntf mus a l f c s i c tng t t ai if t lege a t ndia i ha pl i if ha bee de i d of rght gua a e by t Cons iuton or l s oft U nied St t s a ntf s n pr ve i s r nt ed he tt i aw he t ae a t tt s de i ton r ule f om co uc co m it by a per on a tng u rcol r ofs a e nd ha hi prva i es t d r nd t m ted s c i nde o tt lw. W e tv.At ns 487U. 42 ( 988 . Le sc ant howeve ,doe notconai asnge a s ki , S. 1 ) e' ompli , r s tn i l c tt i lc a m a i ta oft na ed def nda s A c di y,t c tfnds t tLee ons iutona l i ga ns ny he m e nt . cor ngl he our i ha ha f ie t sae a c tt i s a ld o t t onsiutonalca m a i ta oft na e de e nt a t e or ,t li gans ny he m d f nda s nd, her f e he c tdi m i s he com pl i . our s s es r a nt 1 11. For t r as ns sa e t c tfndst tLe has no pr s nt d a cai on whih he e o t t d, he our i ha e t e e e ny l ms c r le c n be gr nt d, and t r f e, dimis s he c e if a a e he e or s se r ompl i , pur ua t 28 U. C. ant s nt o S. j1 5()2)B)i) 91 e( ( (i. The Cl r i die ed t s nd a c oft sM e or ndum Opi on a ac om pa ng e k s r ct o e opy hi m a ni nd c nyi .----M , ..ë .. < Or rt pli if de o antf . EN TER : 'hs f r il dyo-uy 2 1 a t l, 0 1 J z' . t d St t s D it i J e a e s rct udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.