Barnes v. Warden of Pocahontas State Correctional Center, No. 7:2010cv00544 - Document 30 (W.D. Va. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 5/16/2018. (tvt)

Download PDF

CLERK: OFFI U,. ST. l CE B . M r Dl A RO T ANOK V E, A FI LED MAt 15 . 1 '28 2 I TI E UN I N I TED STATES DI STRI C OUR T CT FOR TI E W ESTERN D I I STR I T OF VI I C RG NG R O AN OK E DIW SIO N BR UCE DW AYN E BAR NES, JULI . 6Y. CA SE NO .7: V00544 10C Pett oner, ii G M O R AN DUM O PI O N NI V. w AR BE N ,PO CA H O NTAS STA TE co Ru EcTl xA L CEN TER , o By: H on.G l E.Conr en ad Seni U nied St es D i ri Judge or t at st ct R es pondent. I t slng-l e ha sc pusaci und r28U. C.j225 t pr . peii r n hi o cos d bea or ton e S. 4, he o K ttone, Br eDwa eBane ,no mo t va t t sc tsdimislor rund rRul 60b)oft uc yn r s w ves o çae hi our' s sa de e e ( he Feder Rul ofCi lProcedur A fer r ew oft r d,t courtconcl al es vi e. t evi he ecor he udes t B a nes' hat r moton mus bede e unde Rul 60() a hi s si mus b co tu a spaaey i t nid r e b, nd s ubmison t e nsred nd e rtl doc tda as c d j2 peiin. kee s e on 254 tto Banws i ta j2254peiin c le dtevai t o hi c i ntunde t 20 ' niil tto halnge h ldiy f s onfneme r he 07 j d me to te Ci utCo r f rS o tCo ny Vigna c n cig hm o a mid me n r u g n f h r i u t o c t u t , r ii, o vitn i f c se a o char and t f ony contoled s t ge wo el r l ubsance of ens Specii l Bar cl m st adm i i f es. fcaly, nes ai hat sson i o e de e o t c rii a e o a l i,sa i t r s t o t d ug a l i pe f m e by nt vi nc f he e tfc t f na ys s t tng he e uls f he r na yss r or d t c ni i ns a t V igi a De rm e of Fo e i Sc e e, vi a e hi rght un r t e h c a t he r ni pa t nt r ns c i nc olt d s i s de he Con r a i n Cl us of t e Si t A m e m e . The r s f ont to a e h xh nd nt e ponde f l d a m oton t d s i s nt ie i o im s Ba ne 'c ai a ba r d by t d t i ofpr e r d f ul,t w hi h Ba ne r s nde The r s l m s re he oc rne oc du al e a t o c r s e po d. Barnes v. Warden of Pocahontas State Correctional Center c tgr n e t m o i n,Gndi t t Ba s h not s our a t d he to ng ha nw ad hown c us f hi pr ce ur l d aul. a e or s o d a ef t Doc. 30 Bane v.W ad n,No.7:0CV005 2011W L 1 r s re 1 44, 42808 ( . Va. .1 201 )( No . 8 W D. Apr 3, 1 ECF s 1 a 20.Bane di no a pe l No ye r l e,Ban mo st ha t c ur' de a of 9 nd ) r s d t p a. w, as atr res ve o ve he o ts nil ha a c r rle va ae unde Rul 60()t rviihi Conr tto Clus cam. be s opus eif c td r e b o e st s fonain a e li Dockets.Justia.com E% L ' ERH , Rul 60( a horz r iffo acvij gme baedo a ngot rt ngs C wl e b) ut ies ele rm i l ud nt s n, mo he hi ,i y ne dic r d e d nce t t w ih r as a e dii nc ,c d no ha be n di c ve e i tme t s ove e vi e ha , t e on bl lge e oul t ve e s o r d n i o mo frane tilu rRul 59( 'orça y oh ra o ta j tfesrle.'Rul 60( ( ve o w ra nde e b)' çn ter e s n h t usi eif' e b)2) a ( .Suc r ifi a e ror nayrme a s dbei edonl whe Eppr praet nd 6) h ele s n xta di r e dy nd houl nvok y n E o it o a accom pls J tce' i dsm atonsi vi e r di y cicum s ances.' Dowel v.St e Far ih ' i ' n si i nvol ng xtaor nar r us t ' l at m Fie Cas Auo I ur Co. 99 F. 46,48 (t Ci.1 93) E h crumsa e wilrr y r . t ns . , 3 2d 4h r 9 . c suc ic tnc s l ael o uri t ha a co e - Gonz l v.Cr b 5 U. 5 535 ( ) A prpe Rul cc n he be s ntxt' ' aes os y, 45 S. 24, 2005 . o r e 6 b moi i af ealha asa ton mus atc (omedee ti t itgrt o t fdea 0() ton n ed r be ci t ta k t s fc n he ne iy f he e rl ha a pr e di ,'r t e t n (he s tnc oft f de alc tsr s u i o a r be s be s oc e ngs' ah r ha s ubsa e he e r our' e olton f ha a l t cam ont meis l a 5 Ont ohe ha : Rul 60( moi t tse t rviit li he rt. d. t 32. he t r nd,$ e b) ton ha e ks o e st he a fdeal ur' de a o t meiso a( be )cam f rle s db tetda as c si e r co ts nil n he rt f ha as li or eif houl e r ae s uc e sve ha a peii ' 1 a 53 Unie Sttsv.W i soc 3 F. 200,206 ( h Ci.2003 be s tton. d. t 4; td ae ' net k, 40 3d 4t r ) ( di Gha dititco t mus te tRul 6 b moi a s c si c ltrlrviw hol ng G t src urs t ra e 0() tons s uc e sve olaea e e t a i tonsw hen f lng t do s woul alow t applcantt evade t baragai tr ii i pplca i aii o o d l he i o he ns eltgaton ofcl m spr ai esent i a prorapplcaton ort baragai tltga i of cl m s notpr ent i a ed n i i i he ns ii ton ai es ed n p i a iai '(ntr quoai maksa ctto omitd . ror pplc ton' i enal tton r nd iain te ) ) Bane 'Rul 60( moto do no i niy a y dee twhas ve i t co tspat r s e b) in es t de tf n fc toe r n he ur' s r lng t thi c a m s i t f r h be a to w e e pr e a l de a t d. Ra h ,Ba ne u i ha s l i n he ede al a as c i n r oc dur ly f ule t er r s ia c rtl a srsta hsiiilj2 5 peiinwa ds se ç t o t rj dc , a dmo e n c u aey se t h t i nta 2 4 tto s imisd ç h u p eu ie' n v s wi ' t r i t t hi Confont ton Cl us c le t hi sa e c tc nvi ton. M o . 1 ECF N o. o e nsa e s r ai a e ha l nge o s t t our o c i t , Ac or ngl t c ur mus de yhi moi unde Rul 60b)a c tu a rdoc thi c di y,he o t t n s ton r e ( nd onsre nd e ke s s sinasaj2 peii Ana opraeor rwile ert sda ubmiso 254 tton. ppr it de l nt hi y. 2 The Cl k i diect t s copi of t s m em or er s r ed o end es hi andum opi on and accompanyi ni ng o de t pe ii ra t c r r o ttone nd o ouns lofr o d. e ec r ENTER :Thi l N da ofM a sC y y, 2018. Seni Unied St esD it i Judge or t at s rct 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.