Sutton v. Colvin, No. 4:2015cv00129 - Document 17 (E.D. Va. 2016)

Court Description: FINAL ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on November 29, 2016. Therefore, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11) is DENIE D; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Additionally, to the extent plaintiff's motion for summary judgment sought a reversal and an award of benefits, it is DENIED. Accordingly, the Commissioner's ruling is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Copies of Order sent as DIRECTED on 12.23.16. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 12/22/2016 and filed on 12/23/2016. (epri, )

Download PDF
Sutton v. Colvin Doc. 17 UNITED FOR THE STATES DISTRICT EASTERN DISTRICT FLED COURT OF VIRGINIA DEC 2 3 2016 Newport News Division C1.ERK, US D'STRICT COURT Nnnpoi K. VA TERRY L. SUTTON, Plaintiff, ACTION NO. V. CAROLYN W. 4:15cvl29 COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. FINAL ORDER Plaintiff, Terry L. Sutton, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration {"Commissioner") denying her claim for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as Rule 72 of the Rules of the United States D i s t r i c t Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge was filed on November 29, 2016, recommending that the district court grant in part and deny in part plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 10), deny defendant's motion for summary judgment {ECF No. 11), and vacate and remand the decision Dockets.Justia.com of the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. It was further recommended that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied to the extent i t sought a reversal and an award of benefits. By copy of the Report and Recommendation, each party was advised of the right to file written objections to recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. the findings and No objections have been filed. Following a ^ novo review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and given the fact that no objections have been filed thereto, the Court ADOPTS the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on November 29, 2016. Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11) Therefore, Defendant's Motion for is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Additionally, to the extent plaintiff's motion for summary judgment sought a reversal and an award of benefits, it is DENIED. Accordingly, the Commissioner's ruling is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. The parties are ADVISED that they may appeal from this Final Order by forwarding a written notice of appeal to the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510. Said written notice must be received by the Clerk within sixty (50) days from the date of this Final Order. The Clerk shall forward a copy of this Final Order to counsel for the parties. /s/ Mark S. Davis United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia December , 2016

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.