Macias et al v. Monterrey Concrete, LLC et al, No. 3:2019cv00830 - Document 121 (E.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/30/2020. (jsmi, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Macias et al v. Monterrey Concrete, LLC et al Doc. 121 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 2211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ARTURO ESPARZA MACIAS, et al., Plaintiffs, V. Civil Action No. 3:19cv830 MONTERREY CONCRETE LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING REMOTE DEPOSITIONS OF CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS (ECF No. 57). For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted. BACKGROUND Arturo Esparza Macias, Victor de los Reyes Rabanales, Cesar Ivan Esparza Esparza, Aguilar, Jaime Marquez Esparza, Jacobo Esparza Aguilar, Jose Luis Guadalupe Gomez Torres, Rodrigo Canales Manuel Marquez Diaz Gomez, Ricardo Salazar, Bladimir Guadalupe Macias Esparza, Catarino Odon Hernandez, Francisco Odon Hernandez, Reuel Eugenio Villagrana Canales, Alonso Cisneros Ayala, Leopoldo Gonzales, Luis Carlos Romero, and Uriel Cisneros (collectively the "Plaintiffs") filed this action on November 6, 2019 against Defendants Monterrey Concrete, LLC ("Monterrey") and Defendant Jose De La Rosa ("De La Rosa" and with Monterrey the Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 2 of 20 PageID# 2212 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 3 of 20 PageID# 2213 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 4 of 20 PageID# 2214 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 5 of 20 PageID# 2215 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 6 of 20 PageID# 2216 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 7 of 20 PageID# 2217 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 8 of 20 PageID# 2218 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 9 of 20 PageID# 2219 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 10 of 20 PageID# 2220 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 11 of 20 PageID# 2221 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 12 of 20 PageID# 2222 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 13 of 20 PageID# 2223 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 14 of 20 PageID# 2224 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 15 of 20 PageID# 2225 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 16 of 20 PageID# 2226 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 17 of 20 PageID# 2227 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 18 of 20 PageID# 2228 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 19 of 20 PageID# 2229 Case 3:19-cv-00830-REP Document 121 Filed 10/30/20 Page 20 of 20 PageID# 2230
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
