Harrison v. Kijakazi, No. 2:2020cv00668 - Document 39 (D. Utah 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order denying 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 08/02/2021. (jl)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Harrison v. Kijakazi Doc. 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Jill A. Harrison, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Case No. 2:20-cv-00668-DBP Kilolo Kijakazi Acting Commissioner for Social Security, Chief Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendant. Plaintiff, Jill Harrison, who is appealing the denial of her claim for Supplemental Security Income, has moved the court for summary judgment. (ECF No. 38.) Local Rule 7-4, which governs actions seeking judicial review of a decision from an administrative agency, provides: In all cases in which a plaintiff files a complaint or petition seeking judicial review of an administrative agency’s decision under an “arbitrary and capricious” or “substantial evidence” standard of review, the following pleadings are not appropriate and must not be filed with the court: (A) an answer to the complaint; (B) a motion for judgment on the pleadings; (C) a motion for summary judgment; or (D) a motion to affirm or reverse the agency’s decision. DUCivR 7-4 (2020). Plaintiff’s motion is improper under the Local Rules and is therefore DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 1 Plaintiff’s counsel is directed to follow the Local Rules in filing the briefing for this matter. Dockets.Justia.com DATED this 2 August 2021. Dustin B. Pead United States Magistrate Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
