Engelhart v. Parish, No. 4:2021cv00562 - Document 14 (S.D. Tex. 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: Parish's motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry Nos. 8, 9, 10), is denied. Parish's motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 11), is stricken as filed too late and without leave to do so. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

Download PDF
Engelhart v. Parish Doc. 14 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In Re Jerry Wayne Parish, Debtor. EVA ENGELHART, TRUSTEE, Plaintiff, v. SUE PARISH, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § July 14, 2022 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Civil Action No. H-21-562 Adversary Case No. 20-3053 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION On April 8, 2021, this court issued an order stating that it would preside over the jury trial in this case, but referred all pretrial matters to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. (Docket Entry No. 3). A month later, the Bankruptcy Court certified that all pretrial matters were resolved, and that the proceeding was ready for trial. (Docket Entry No. 4). In March 2022, this court set a final pretrial conference date for August 8, 2022, and with jury selection to occur as soon as the court’s and parties’ schedules allowed. (Docket Entry No. 7). No party indicated a need for pretrial motions. Now, after all pretrial matters are resolved and the final pretrial conference is less than a month away, the defendant, Susan Parish, has now moved for leave to file a motion for summary judgment and has moved for summary judgment. (Docket Entry Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11). The plaintiff and trustee, Eva Engelhart, opposes the motion for leave, arguing that it is untimely and pointing to numerous procedural deficiencies and local rule violations. (Docket Entry No. 12). Although Dockets.Justia.com confusingly docketed as an opposed response to her own summary judgment motion, Parish replied to Engelhart. (Docket Entry No. 13). The deadline to file dispositive motions in the Bankruptcy Court was October 21, 2020. (Docket Entry No. 12-1). Parish claims that she could not do so because of COVID. She offers no explanation, however, for her failure to raise the need for a summary judgment motion until June 2022. Parish took no action when the Bankruptcy Court certified the case as ready for trial in May 2021, or in March 2022, when this court set the final pretrial date. Thirteen months of delay, without reason, does not show good cause to extend all the deadlines and allow a summary judgment motion. See FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4); Victory Lane Motorsports, LLC v. Wide-Open Sports Mktg., Inc., No. H-20-2006, 2020 WL 7484769, at *1 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2020). (“The good-cause standard focuses on the diligence of the party asking the court to modify the scheduling order.”). Parish’s motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry Nos. 8, 9, 10), is denied. Parish’s motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 11), is stricken as filed too late and without leave to do so. SIGNED on July 14, 2022, at Houston, Texas. _______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.