Dallas County et al v. Cavaness et al, No. 3:2022cv01558 - Document 16 (N.D. Tex. 2023)
Court Description: Order Accepting 15 Findings and Recommendations. Defendant's 13 Motion to Reopen Case is liberally construed as a motion for relief from judgment under Fed R Civ P 60(b) and DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 10/26/2023) (cfk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dallas County et al v. Cavaness et al Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DALLAS COUNTY, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. DWIGHT HENRY CAVANESS, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § No. 3:22-CV-1558-E-BH ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the defendant’s Plea, filed October 3, 2023 (doc. 13), is liberally construed as a motion for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and DENIED. SO ORDERED: October 26, 2023. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
