Smith v. Beneficial Financial I Inc. et al, No. 3:2017cv03243 - Document 13 (N.D. Tex. 2018)

Court Description: Order Accepting 12 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 7 Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, the court grants Defendants' 7 Motion to Dismiss and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's claims and this action as barred by res judicata. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/5/2018) (epm)

Download PDF

Smith v. Beneficial Financial I Inc. et al Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION § § § § § § § § § § YADA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL I, INC. and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-3243-L ORDER On August 10, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford entered the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) (Doc. 12), recommending that the court grant, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7), filed December 6, 2017, and dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff’s claims as barred by res judicata. Plaintiff did not file a response to the Motion to Dismiss or objections to the Report within the time for filing objections. After reviewing the motion, pleadings, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff’s claims and this action as barred by res judicata. It is so ordered this 5th day of September, 2018. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.