Montgomery v. Fitzsimmons et al, No. 3:2011cv02541 - Document 11 (N.D. Tex. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 11/9/2011) (ctf)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Montgomery v. Fitzsimmons et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION GEORGE WILLIAM MONTGOMERY, JR., Plaintiff, v. GARY FITZSIMMONS, ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-2541-L ORDER George William Montgomery, Jr., a Texas prisoner, brought this pro se civil rights action against the Dallas County District Clerk, the Dallas County District Attorney, and the lawyer who represented him at his criminal trial. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan Magistrate, who entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on October 21, 2011, recommending that the case be summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1951(e)(2) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. No objections to the Report were filed. Having reviewed the pleadings in this case, Plaintiff’s answers to the court’s interrogatories, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct. The court therefore accepts the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions as those of the court and dismisses this action with prejudice. Order – Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com It is so ordered this 9th day of November, 2011. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
