Watkins v. Rodriguez, No. 3:2011cv00745 - Document 18 (N.D. Tex. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 10 Findings and Recommendations on Case. Accordingly, plaintiff is permitted to prosecute his claims against defendant Officer Rodriguez for false arrest and coercing a witness to commit perjury. Plaintiff's other claims are summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 6/28/2011) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Watkins v. Rodriguez Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION HENRY LEE WATKINS, Plaintiff, VS. OFFICER RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. § § § § Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-0745-D § § § § § ORDER After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct and are therefore adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff is permitted to prosecute his claims against defendant Officer Rodriguez for false arrest and coercing a witness to commit perjury. Plaintiff’s other claims are summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). SO ORDERED. June 28, 2011. _________________________________ SIDNEY A. FITZWATER CHIEF JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
