Hodge v. Zimmerman et al, No. 2:2022cv00200 - Document 69 (N.D. Tex. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION re: 54 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 32 Motion for Injunction filed by Theotis Lee Hodge, 51 Motion for TRO, Motion for Injunction filed by Theotis Lee Hodge. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 12/14/2023) (nht)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hodge v. Zimmerman et al Doc. 69 N THE LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION THEOTIS LEE HODGE, Plaintiff, 2:22-CV-00200-Z-BR V D.ZIMMERMAN, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court are the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to deny the Motion for an Order to Show Cause for a Preliminary Injunction ("PI") (ECF No. 32) and Request for a Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO") (ECF No. 5l) (collectively, the "Motions") filed by Plaintiff Theotis Lee Hodge. Objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation have been filed. See ECF No. 63. After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, the Court concludes that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct. ECF No. 54. It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED and Plaintiff s Motions for PI and TRO are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. December il,2023 J. KACSMARYK T]NITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
