Delk v. Superior Office Services, Inc., No. 3:2013cv00758 - Document 34 (M.D. Tenn. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In accordance with the 33 Stipulation, Plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Having dismissed the federal claim in this action, the Court no longer has subject matter jurisd iction. Accordingly, all other claims herein are DISMISSED without prejudice. Any pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. The pretrial conference set for September 29, 2014, and the jury trial set for Octo ber 7, 2014, are canceled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/1/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)

Download PDF
Delk v. Superior Office Services, Inc. Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ROBERT L. DELK v. SUPERIOR OFFICE SERVICES, INC. ) ) ) NO. 3-13-0758 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Plaintiff has filed a document entitled “Stipulation of Dismissal of 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act Claim and Additional Suggestion of Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction” (Docket No. 33). In accordance with that Stipulation, Plaintiff’s Americans with Disabilities Act claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Having dismissed the federal claim in this action, the Court no longer has subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, all other claims herein are DISMISSED without prejudice. Any pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. The pretrial conference set for September 29, 2014, and the jury trial set for October 7, 2014, are canceled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.