Little v. Ellis Moving and Storage, LLC, No. 3:2012cv00689 - Document 26 (M.D. Tenn. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER: In light of the Joint Stipulation filed by the parties 25 , Plaintiff's claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act are DISMISSED. Having dismissed all federal claims, the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), decline s to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law (Tennessee Human Rights Act and common law retaliation) claims, and those claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file, and any pending Motions are denied as moot. The pretrial conference set for 10/7/2013, and the jury trial set for 10/15/2013, are canceled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/28/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
Little v. Ellis Moving and Storage, LLC Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ELIZABETH A. LITTLE v. ELLIS MOVING AND STORAGE, LLC ) ) ) NO. 3-12-0689 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER In light of the Joint Stipulation filed by the parties (Docket No.25), Plaintiff’s claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act are DISMISSED. Having dismissed all federal claims, the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law (Tennessee Human Rights Act and common law retaliation) claims, and those claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file, and any pending Motions are denied as moot. The pretrial conference set for October 7, 2013, and the jury trial set for October 15, 2013, are canceled. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.