Runions v. Lewis County Jail et al, No. 3:2010cv00103 - Document 56 (M.D. Tenn. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 52 , to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recom mendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 46 is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Southern Health Partners are DISMISSED. All Defendants having been dismissed, the Clerk is dir ected to close this file. The bench trial set for June 28, 2011, and the pretrial conference set for June 10, 2011, are canceled. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 2/17/2011. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)

Download PDF
Runions v. Lewis County Jail et al Doc. 56 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION WESLEY REED RUNIONS v. LEWIS COUNTY JAIL, et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-10-0103 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 52), to which no Objections have been filed.1 The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file.2 The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No.46) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Southern Health Partners are DISMISSED. All Defendants having been dismissed, the Clerk is directed to close this file. The bench trial set for June 28, 2011, and the pretrial conference set for June 10, 2011, are canceled. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 The record reflects that the service copy of the Report and Recommendation addressed to the Plaintiff at his last known address was returned. Docket No. 55. In fact, mail sent from the Court to Plaintiff has been consistently returned since June 24, 2010 (Docket No. 34). Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the Court apprised of his current address. 2 As indicated in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff failed to file a timely response to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment and was then ordered to show cause why that Motion should not be granted (see Docket No.48). Plaintiff failed to obey that Order of the Court. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.