Choate v. Putnam County Sheriff's Dept., No. 2:2016cv00057 - Document 3 (M.D. Tenn. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/16/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Download PDF
Choate v. Putnam County Sheriff's Dept. Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION DERRICK JUSTIN CHOATE Plaintiff, v. PUTNAM COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT Defendant. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] No. 2:16-0057 Judge Trauger MEMORANDUM The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, is a pre-trial detainee at the Putnam County Jail in Cookeville, Tennessee. He brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Putnam County Sheriff’s Department, seeking injunctive relief and damages. On June 24, 2016, the plaintiff made disparaging remarks about a guard’s mother. In response, the guard allegedly assaulted the plaintiff while he was restrained in handcuffs. To establish a claim for § 1983 relief, the plaintiff must plead and prove that a person or persons, while acting under color of state law, deprived him of some right guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981). A county sheriff’s department is not a “person” subject to liability under § 1983. Petty v. County of Franklin, Ohio, 478 F.3d 341, 347 (6th Cir. 2007). Of course, giving this pro se pleading a liberal construction, the Court could construe the complaint as an attempt to state a claim against Putnam County, the entity responsible for the operation of the Putnam County Sheriff’s Department. 1 Dockets.Justia.com However, for Putnam County to be liable, the plaintiff would have to allege and prove that his constitutional rights were violated pursuant to a “policy statement, ordinance, regulation or decision officially adopted and promulgated” by the county. Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 689-690 (1978). No such allegation appears in the complaint. Therefore, the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Under such circumstances, the Court is obliged to dismiss the complaint sua sponte. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). An appropriate order will be entered. ______________________________ Aleta A. Trauger United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.