Hartley v. Carter County et al, No. 2:2020cv00250 - Document 6 (E.D. Tenn. 2020)
Court Description: JUDGMENT ORDER, this prisoner's pro se civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the me morandum opinion and order that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Clifton L. Corker on 12/1/20. (c/m)(ADA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hartley v. Carter County et al Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE DALLAS J. HARTLEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. CARTER COUNTY, DEXTER LUNSFORD, MICHAEL MURRY, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, CARTER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, MELINDA MURRY, MATTHEW KEIBLER, ASHLEY RYMER, SAMANTHA MANEY, and CENTURION OF TENNESSEE, L.L.C., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:20-CV-250-DCLC-CRW JUDGMENT ORDER For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion and order filed herewith, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this prisoner’s pro se civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion and order that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. SO ORDERED. s/Clifton L. Corker United States District Judge Case 2:20-cv-00250-DCLC-CRW Document 6 Filed 12/01/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 38 Dockets.Justia.com ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT /s/ John L. Medearis CLERK OF COURT 2 Case 2:20-cv-00250-DCLC-CRW Document 6 Filed 12/01/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 39
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
