Rosario-Gonzalez v. Rosario-Gonzalez et al, No. 3:2008cv01837 - Document 24 (D.P.R. 2009)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; noted [6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 16, 17] INFORMATIVE motions; noted 15 Motion requesting Order; denying 18 Motion requesting Order; striking 19 Motion for Default Judgment; denyin g [20, 21] Motions for Default Judgment. Plaintiff granted until March 24, 2009 to file final Amended Complaint. Failure to timely file amended complaint will result in dismissal. Plaintiff shall not file any further motions until Court has reviewed amended complaint. Clerk of Court to send copy of Order by certified mail, return receipt requested to: Daniel Rosario-Gonzalez, BH 4 Dr. Jose Antonio Davila, Quinta Seccion, Levittown Lakes, Toa Baja, P.R., 00949. Signed by Judge Carmen C. Cerezo on 2/18/09. (mmd) Modified on 2/19/2009 to re-classify as O&O (mim).

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ Plaintiff vs CIVIL 08-1837CCC WILFREDO ROSARIO-GONZALEZ GUSTAVO REYES IVAN ROSARIO-GONZALEZ ZENAIDA PULIDO EDWIN ROSARIO-GONZALEZ Defendants OPINION AND ORDER The pro-se action before us is of vague jurisdictional and statutory source. Plaintiff Daniel Rosario-GonzÃ¡lez Amended Detailed Complaint Motion,1 filed November 20, 2008 (docket entry 11), states, as a basis for federal jurisdiction: Violation of Plaintiff s Constitutional Rights, Violations of David Rosario Rosado Constitutional Rights, Violations of United States of America Laws, Federal Question Case, and Diversity Case. With regard to the Claim, he repeats the items listed for federal jurisdiction. The record also contains ten informative motions (docket entries 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 16 and 17)2 from plaintiff which, although submitted in English,3 are unintelligible. Related to these documents are the following motions: Defendant Wilfredo Rosario-GonzÃ¡lez Special Appearance Requesting Dismissal of the Complaint Pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. 12(b)(1) filed October 14, 2008 (docket entry 5). Inasmuch as it addresses the original complaint, is DENIED. 1 The original complaint filed October 14, 2008 was submitted in Spanish, without a translation. 2 3 The Informative Motions (6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 16 and 17) are NOTED. Docket entries 7, 9, and 13 are accompanied by attachments in Spanish with no translations. CIVIL 08-1837CCC 2 Plaintiff s Solicitation Motion requesting access to view and obtain copies through the EM/ECF (docket entry 15) is NOTED. There is public access to the system in the Office of the Clerk of Court. Plaintiff s Solicitation Motion filed December 1, 2008 (docket entry 18) requesting that the Court order Banco Bilbao Viscaya Argentaria, Pentagon Federal Credit Union, Oficina de la Persona de Edad Avanzada/Asuntos de la Vejez, Departamento de la FamiliaOficina de Levittown Lakes, to release to him all videos, all call transcripts and all sorts of documentation that are in their power.... (page2, ¶1), is DENIED. Plaintiff s Solicitation Motion filed December 12, 2008 (docket entries 19) requesting Judgment By Default against unspecified defendants is STRICKEN. Plaintiff s Solicitation Motion filed December 30, 2008 (docket entries 20) requesting Judgment By Default against IvÃ¡n Rosario GonzÃ¡lez and Zenaida Pulido is DENIED. Plaintiff s Judgment by Default Demand Motion filed January 12, 2009 (docket entry 21) requesting Judgment By Default against IvÃ¡n Rosario GonzÃ¡lez and Zenaida Pulido is DENIED. While pro-se pleadings are to be liberally construed in favor of the pro se party, Ayala Serrano v. LebrÃ³n GonzÃ¡lez, 909 F.2d 8, 12 (1st Cir. 1990), plaintiff s amended complaint contains no specifics for the Court to construe. Therefore, plaintiff is granted until March 24, 2009 in which to file a final Amended Complaint, in English, printed in standard size type, in which the specific source of jurisdiction is set forth, as well as the parties and the specific facts and events on which he bases his claims. The claims shall be identified individually, with the particular statute pursuant to which they are brought, and the party against whom the specific claim is made. Failure to timely file the second amended complaint will result in dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Cv.P. 12(b)(6). CIVIL 08-1837CCC 3 It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff Daniel Rosario GonzÃ¡lez shall not file any further motions until such time as the Court has reviewed his final amended complaint for compliance with this Order, after which the stay of further filings shall be lifted. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order to plaintiff Daniel RosarioGonzÃ¡lez by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following address: Daniel Rosario-GonzÃ¡lez, BH 4 Dr. JosÃ© Antonio DÃ¡vila, Quinta SecciÃ³n, Levittown Lakes, Toa Baja, Puerto Rico, 00949. SO ORDERED. At San Juan, Puerto Rico, on February 18, 2009. S/CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.