Burgos-Yantin et al v. Municipality of Juana Diaz et al, No. 3:2007cv01146 - Document 244 (D.P.R. 2009)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER denying 242 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 12/4/09. (SAA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 3 4 5 6 7 8 CARMEN D. BURGOS-YANTIN, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 07-1146 (GAG) MUNICIPALITY OF JUANA DIAZ, et al. Defendants. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OPINION AND ORDER The court affirms its Opinion and Order at Docket No. 237 and after considering the arguments presented in Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 242) and Defendants Opposition (Docket No. 243) DENIES Plaintiff s motion and DISMISSES, with prejudice, the supplemental state law negligence claims brought against the Municipality and the Supervisors.. The court has found that Plaintiffs have failed to provide evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact demonstrating the negligence of these defendants in their roles as supervisors and policy makers under § 1983 liability. The court s finding was grounded in Plaintiffs failure to sufficiently demonstrate causation between the Municipality and Supervisory-Defendant s acts or omissions and the actions taken by the allegedly offending officers. While the standard for negligence under the state law claim may not be as exacting as the deliberate indifference standard required under a § 1983 claim, such a claim still demands a showing of causation. As the court has previously ruled, Plaintiffs have failed to proffer sufficient evidence to make such a showing. In their Motion for Reconsideration, Plaintiffs aver that, under Article 1802 of the Puerto Rico Civil Code governments or municipalities are vicariously liable for the actions of their officers. While such a statement of the law may be correct, Plaintiffs complaint does not plead a cause of action based on vicarious liability and thus cannot now be the subject of a Motion for Reconsideration. See FDIC v. World University, Inc., 978 F.2d 10, 16 (1st Cir. 1992) (motions for 1 Civil No. 07-1146(GAG) 2 reconsideration should not be used to raise arguments which could, and should, have been made 3 before judgment issued ) (internal quotations omitted). However, because such a claim was never 4 raised before this court, this court s ruling at this time has no preclusive effect on any state law claim 5 of Plaintiffs against the Municipality or Supervisory-Defendants based on vicarious liability. 2 6 Therefore, the court DISMISSES, with prejudice, the state law negligence claims brought 7 against the Municipality of Juana Diaz as well as the Supervisory-Defendants under the Plaintiffs 8 theory of supervisory liability. The only claims remaining before this court are those based on the 9 individual liability of Sgt. Colon and Officers Conde, Alvarado, and Torres. (See Docket No. 235.) 10 11 12 SO ORDERED. In San Juan, Puerto Rico this 4th day of December, 2009. 13 s/ Gustavo A. Gelpà 14 GUSTAVO A. GELPI United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
