WOODSON v. SHEESLEY et al, No. 1:2020cv00310 - Document 74 (W.D. Pa. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION re 63 MOTION for Sanctions filed by ANGEL GRESSEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 8/24/2022. (dlh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WOODSON v. SHEESLEY et al Doc. 74 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 1 of 11 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 2 of 11 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 3 of 11 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 4 of 11 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 5 of 11 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 6 of 11 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 7 of 11 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 8 of 11 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 9 of 11 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 10 of 11 Case 1:20-cv-00310-RAL Document 74 Filed 08/24/22 Page 11 of 11 the issuance of this Order, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined. 2. After the Court has received Woodson's certified inmate account statement, the Court will calculate an appropriate monetary sanction and direct Woodson to pay that same amount to attorney Cassidy L. Neal at her address of record as the party injured by the violation giving rise to the sanction. 3. Woodson shall not communicate directly with defense counsel without the prior approval of the Court, except he may send correspondence necessary to propound or respond to legitimate and appropriate discovery requests. 4. Under no circumstances shall Woodson transmit any materials of a sexual, explicit, or pornographic nature to any attorney or party in this action or request such materials from any party or attorney. Should Woodson fail to comply with any of these directives, the Court will recommend that Woodson's claims against Gressel be dismissed, with prejudice, for sanctionable misconduct and a refusal to obey court orders. In the meantime, the Clerk will be directed to administratively close this case and stay all further deadlines and discovery until such time as Woodson has fully complied with the Court's instructions. III. Conclusion For the reasons set forth above, Defendant's motion for sanctions is granted in part and denied in part. An order setting forth the terms of RICHARDX: t1 United States Magistrate Judge Dated: August 24, 2022 11
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
