Brown v. Premo et al, No. 6:2020cv00231 - Document 23 (D. Or. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 21 . Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 15 is Granted and this case is Dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 8/31/20 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(David Brown, Prisoner ID: 16555088) (gm)

Download PDF
Brown v. Premo et al Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DAVID H. BROWN, Case No. 6:20-cv-00231-JR Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. JEFF PREMO, Oregon State Penitentiary Facility Warden, et al., Defendants. MOSMAN,J., On August 10, 2020, Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo issued her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") [ECF 21], recommending that this court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF 15]. No objections were filed. Upon review, I agree with Judge Russo. I GRANT the motion and DISMISS this case. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 1 - OPINION & ORDER Dockets.Justia.com the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any pait of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). CONCLUSION Upon review, I agree with Judge Russo's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [21]. I GRANT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [15] and DISMISS this case with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this Sl1tof 2 - OPINION & ORDER r, 2020. ~~UJ..·

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.