Stiles et al v. Kahn et al, No. 3:2023cv00996 - Document 12 (D. Or. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER: Because no party in this case has made objections, this Court reviews Judge You's Findings and Recommendations for clear error on the face of the record. Finding no such error, the Court ADOPTS Judge You's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 7 . Therefore, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 8/21/2023 by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (Deposited in the outgoing mail to pro se parties on 8/21/2023.) (pvh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Stiles et al v. Kahn et al Doc. 12 Case 3:23-cv-00996-YY Document 12 Filed 08/21/23 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON STEVEN F. STILES, ANDREA M. CASANOVA, and CASANOVA STILES FAMILY TRUST, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00996-YY Plaintiffs, ORDER v. JAN L. KAHN, AARON KAHN, CAROLINE ZAPP KAHN, and KAHN, SOARS, CONWAY LLP, Defendants. Adrienne Nelson, District Judge United States Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued Findings and Recommendation in this case on July 26, 2023. Judge You recommended that this Court dismiss this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). No party has filed objections. A district court judge may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If any party files objections to a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations, "the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report." Id. If no objections are filed, then no standard of review applies. However, further review by the district court sua sponte is not prohibited. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985). The Advisory Committee notes to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) recommend that unobjected to proposed findings and recommendations be reviewed for "clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note to 1983 amendment. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:23-cv-00996-YY Document 12 Filed 08/21/23 Page 2 of 2 Because no party in this case has made objections, this Court reviews Judge You's Findings and Recommendations for clear error on the face of the record. Finding no such error, the Court ADOPTS Judge You's Findings and Recommendation, ECF [7]. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 21st day of August, 2023. ______________________ Adrienne Nelson United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
