Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company v. Radian Construction Corporation et al, No. 3:2021cv00497 - Document 29 (D. Or. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER. Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R (ECF 27 ). I GRANT Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (ECF 23 ) and enter judgment against Defendant Radian Construction Corporation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 12/15/2021 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company v. Radian Construction Corporation et al Case 3:21-cv-00497-SB Document 29 Doc. 29 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 3:21-cv-00497-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. RADIAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. MOSMAN,J., On November 29, 2021, Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") [ECF 27], recommending that I grant Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Radian Construction Corporation [ECF 23]. No objections were filed. Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman and GRANT the motion. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations oftlie magistrate judge but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The comi is generally required to make a de nova determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 1 OPINION & ORDER Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:21-cv-00497-SB Document 29 Filed 12/15/21 Page 2 of 2 is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrntiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). CONCLUSION Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [ECF 27]. I GRANT Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment [ECF 23] and enter judgment against Defendant Radian Constrnction Corporation. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this /c.;i~f December, 2021. /_/ 't{C0'- 2 - OPINION & ORDER
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
