Xiong v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, No. 3:2006cv01775 - Document 28 (D. Or. 2008)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Stewart's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 24 as my own opinion. Signed on 2/5/08 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

Download PDF
Xiong v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON LIA X. XIONG No. CV 06-1775-ST Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MOSMAN, J., On December 19, 2007, Magistrate Judge Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (#24) in the above-captioned case recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED and REMANDED for the calculation and payment of benefits pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). No objections to the F&R have been filed (#27). The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are Dockets.Justia.com addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any of the magistrate judge's F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Stewart's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R (#24) as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 5th day of February, 2008. /s/ Michael W. Mosman MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.