Jefferson v. Attorney General of the United States of America, No. 5:2005cv00442 - Document 11 (W.D. Okla. 2005)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 10 Motion to Compel and to Reinstate Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2241 Petition . Signed by Judge Robin J. Cauthron on 8/11/05. (lg, )

Download PDF
Jefferson v. Attorney General of the United States of America Case 5:05-cv-00442-C Doc. 11 Document 11 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JAMES CRAIG JEFFERSON, Petitioner, vs. T.C. PETERSON, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case Number CIV-05-442-C MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Petitioner s Motion to Compel and to Reinstate Petitioner s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition. On April 19, 2005, Petitioner filed a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging his counsel was ineffective in negotiating the plea agreement. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts who determined that Petitioner was challenging the validity of his conviction and had failed to demonstrate relief was unavailable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court adopted Judge Roberts Recommendation on July 29, 2005, and dismissed the action. Petitioner filed the present motion on August 9, 2005, asserting that he had not received Judge Roberts Order and therefore did not realize he needed to file an objection. Review of the Court file supports Petitioner s argument. On June 17, 2005, Petitioner s copy of Judge Roberts Recommendation was returned as undeliverable. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the Judgment entered on July 29, 2005 (Dkt. No. 9) and GRANTS Petitioner additional time to file an Objection. Petitioner s objection to Judge Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:05-cv-00442-C Document 11 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 2 of 2 Roberts Report and Recommendation must be filed not later than August 29, 2005. The Court Clerk is directed to include a copy of Judge Roberts Report and Recommendation when mailing this Order to Petitioner. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of August, 2005. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.