Douglas v. Social Security Administration, No. 3:2023cv00299 - Document 5 (S.D. Ohio 2023)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3); and 2. The case be terminated on the Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10/30/23. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Douglas v. Social Security Administration Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON CEDRIC DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, vs. SOCIAL SECURTIY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:23-cv-299 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. (Doc. #2), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3); and 2. The case be terminated on the Court’s docket. October 30, 2023 s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
