Doe v. Ohio Attorney General et al, No. 3:2020cv00010 - Document 24 (S.D. Ohio 2020)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT OHIO ATTORNEY GENERALS UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY (DOC. # 22 ); STAYING ALL DISCOVERY PENDING RULINGS ON DEFENDANTS MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOCS. ## 12 and 13 ); VACATING NOVEMBER 5, 2020, CONFERENCE CALL. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/2/20. (pb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Doe v. Ohio Attorney General et al Doc. 24 Case: 3:20-cv-00010-WHR-SLO Doc #: 24 Filed: 11/02/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 247 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JANE DOE, et al., : Plaintiffs, v. : DAVE YOST, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:20-cv-10 JUDGE WALTER H. RICE : DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY (DOC. #22); STAYING ALL DISCOVERY PENDING RULINGS ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOCS. ##12 and 13); VACATING NOVEMBER 5, 2020, CONFERENCE CALL For good cause shown, the Court SUSTAINS Defendant Ohio Attorney General’s Unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery, Doc. #22, and STAYS all discovery pending rulings on Defendants’ Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings, Docs. ##12, 13. The Court VACATES the conference call previously scheduled for November 5, 2020, at 4:00 p.m. Date: November 2, 2020 (tp - per Judge Rice authorization after his review) WALTER H. RICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
