Chatman v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, No. 2:2022cv03277 - Document 11 (S.D. Ohio 2022)
Court Description: ORDER- This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 10 .) The October 25, 2022 Opinion and Order (ECF No. 8 ) and Clerks Judgment (ECF No. 9 ) are VACATED. Plaintiff shall have until NOVEMBER 23, 2022 to objec t to the Magistrate Judges September 19, 2022 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6 ). Signed by Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 11/18/2022. (cmw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Chatman v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SHERRI C. CHATMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 2:22-cv-3277 Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 10.) Therein, Plaintiff asserts that she did not receive notice of the Magistrate Judge’s September 19, 2022 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) until after the Court adopted the Report and Recommendation in the absence of any objections on October 25, 2022 (ECF No. 8). Accordingly, the October 25, 2022 Opinion and Order (ECF No. 8) and Clerk’s Judgment (ECF No. 9) are VACATED. Plaintiff shall have until NOVEMBER 23, 2022 to object to the Magistrate Judge’s September 19, 2022 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 11/18/2022 EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
