Brown v. Gray et al, No. 2:2019cv02425 - Document 92 (S.D. Ohio 2022)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER adopting 91 the Report and Recommendation; denying 78 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/13/2022. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brown v. Gray et al Doc. 92 Case: 2:19-cv-02425-MHW-MRM Doc #: 92 Filed: 09/13/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 606 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Mllous Brown, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:19-cv-2425 V. Judge Michael H. Watson David Gray, Warden, Magistrate Judge Merz Beimont Correctional institution, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff in this prisoner civii rights case moved for a deciaratory judgment and/or temporary injunctive reiief. Mot., EOF No. 78. Magistrate Judge Merz issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending the Court deny PlaintifTs motion. R&R, EOF No. 91. The R&R notified the parties of their right to object to the same and of the consequences for failing to do so. Id at 3. The deadline for objecting has passed, and no objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R and DENIES PlaintifTs motion. The Clerk shall terminate ECF No. 78 as a pending motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. IICHAEL H. WATSON,JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
