Reed v. Warden, Correctional Reception Center, No. 2:2018cv00167 - Document 26 (S.D. Ohio 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 6/17/2019. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Reed v. Warden, Correctional Reception Center Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CHARLES REED, III, Petitioner, CASE NO. 2:18-CV-167 JUDGE JAMES L. GRAHAM Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson v. WARDEN, CORRECTIONAL RECEPTION CENTER, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER On December 31, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be denied and that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 19.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, and the Court granted Petitioner three extensions of time for the filing of objections, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19)) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealabililty. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: June 17, 2019 _________s/James L. Graham___________ JAMES L. GRAHAM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
