Thompson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, No. 2:2014cv00660 - Document 20 (S.D. Ohio 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Senior Judge Peter C. Economus on 9/18/2015. (ds)

Download PDF
Thompson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KAREN M. THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:14-cv-660 Judge Peter C. Economus COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge Terrence P. Kemp MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 19.) The Magistrate Judge recommended, that the Court remand this action to the Commissioner. (Id.) Plaintiff Karen M. Thompson filed this action seeking review of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Magistrate Judge found that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) failed to base his decision on substantial evidence. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff’s case required a more in depth analysis of Plaintiff’s depression and the functional limitations caused by depression symptoms. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a “waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (Report & Recommendation, ECF No. 14 at 22.) The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Dockets.Justia.com The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors is SUSTAINED, and this action is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration of plaintiffs medical impairments. IT IS SO ORDERED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.