Najdl v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, No. 1:2021cv01578 - Document 15 (N.D. Ohio 2022)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order. No objections having been heard, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 13 ), which this Court finds to be properly reasoned, is adopted. The Commissioner's decision is reversed and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. This case is closed. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/18/2022. (E,CK)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Najdl v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JOHN R. NAJDL, PLAINTIFF, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:21-cv-1578 JUDGE SARA LIOI MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On July 8, 2022, Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay filed his Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 13) with respect to plaintiff John R. Najdl’s complaint for judicial review of defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s determination with respect to Najdl’s application for disability insurance benefits. The R&R concludes that the Commissioner erred by finding that a prior Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) residual functional capacity (“RFC”) determination was still binding and precluded a finding of disability. As a result of this error, the R&R further concludes that Najdl was not afforded the de novo review of the medical evidence to which he was entitled. The ALJ’s January 19, 2021 determination became the Commissioner’s final decision by virtue of the Appeals Council’s denial of Najdl’s request for review. (Doc. No. 13 at 2.) The R&R recommends that the Commissioner’s determination be reversed and that the matter be remanded for further proceedings; in particular, the R&R directs that “[t]he ALJ should Dockets.Justia.com review [Najdl’s] records again, but without a presumption that the prior ALJ’s RFC is proper until the evidence establishes a significant change in condition.” (Doc. No. 13 at 20.) Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), any party may file objections to an R&R. Properly filed objections are given de novo review by this Court. See also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); LR 72.3(b). On July 15, 2022, defendant Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Kilolo Kijakazi, filed a response to the R&R indicating that the Commissioner “will not be filing objections to this Honorable Court’s Report and Recommended Decision.” Accordingly, no objections having been heard, the R&R, which this Court finds to be properly reasoned, is adopted. The Commissioner’s decision is reversed and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. This case is closed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 18, 2022 HONORABLE SARA LIOI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
