Grant v. Erdos, No. 1:2021cv01156 - Document 15 (N.D. Ohio 2022)

Court Description: Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. (ECF No. 14 ). Petitioner's writ of habeas corpus Petition is dismissed, Petitioner's Motio n to Suppress Evidence (ECF No. 10 ) is denied as moot, and Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11 ) is also denied as moot. Additionally, as provided in the Report and Recommendation, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 191 5(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/9/2022. (JLG)

Download PDF
Grant v. Erdos Doc. 15 PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL GRANT, Petitioner, v. WARDEN RONALD ERDOS, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:21CV1156 JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving ECF Nos. 10, 11 and Regarding ECF No. 14] On August 18, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay issued a Report and Recommendation denying Petitioner’s request for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as time-barred (ECF No. 14) and denying Petitioner’s Motion to Suppress Evidence (ECF No. 10) as moot.1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service. In the instant case, objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by September 1, 2022. Neither party has filed objections, evidencing satisfaction with the magistrate judge’s recommendations. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). 1 Although the Report and Recommendation does not explicitly resolve the Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11), it is clear from the writing that this motion must also be denied as moot. Dockets.Justia.com (1:21CV1156) Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is hereby adopted. (ECF No. 14). Petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus Petition is dismissed, Petitioner’s Motion to Suppress Evidence (ECF No. 10) is denied as moot, and Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) is also denied as moot. Additionally, as provided in the Report and Recommendation, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed R. App. P. 22(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. September 9, 2022 Date /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.