Mallin v. City of Eastlake et al, No. 1:2009cv00223 - Document 54 (N.D. Ohio 2011)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order As the docket reflects, this matter was transferred to the docket of the undersigned on 1/20/2011. Prior to that transfer, then District Judge OMalley issued a Memorandum or Order and Opinion ruling on Defendants& #039; Motion for Summary Judgment and for Dismissal of State Law Claims. ECF No. 42 . In that ruling, Judge OMalley required cause to be shown "as to why the City of Eastlake is not immune from Mallin's intentional infliction of emotion al distress claim within 14 days" of the issuance of her ruling, by 10/14/2010. The docket reflects that Mallin has not shown cause. Summary judgment is therefore granted in favor of the City of Eastlake on the issue of state law immunity. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/15/2011. (S,L)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.