Phelan v. Quinn et al, No. 9:2011cv00314 - Document 34 (N.D.N.Y 2012)

Court Description: DECISION and ORDER: The 33 Report and Recommendation is accepted in whole. ORDERED that 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is granted in part and denied in part; Plaintiff's claims for damages against the individual defenda nts in both their individual and official capacities under the Americans with Disabilities Act are DISMISSED; Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief against the individual defendants in their official capacities REMAIN; Plaintiff's re maining claims as to defendants Quinn, Minal, Torres, and Washer are DISMISSED without prejudice to allow amendment as directed in this Order. Plaintiff's claim against Nurse Ted is DISMISSED; and Plaintiff is granted until July 20, 2012, t o file a second amended complaint to assert causes of action for (a) the use of excessive force in violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, (b) retaliation for filing complaints and grievances in violation of his First Amendment right to seek the redress of grievances, and (c) failing to protect Phelan from harm posed by other inmates in violationof his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 6/19/12. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------KENNETH J. PHELAN, Plaintiff, 9:11-CV-314 (DNH/DRH) -v- QUINN, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; SWAN, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; McDONALD, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; WARRINGTON, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; WASHER, Sergeant, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; MINAL, Psychologist, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; TORRES, Counselor, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; OWENS, Sergeant, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; GEBO, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; FULLER, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; KISER, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; MURPHY, Correctional Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility; and NURSE TED, Nurse, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: KENNETH J. PHELAN Plaintiff Pro Se 09-A-1183 Five Points Correctional Facility Caller Box 119 Romulus, NY 14541 OF COUNSEL: HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendants The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 ADRIENNE J. KERWIN, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et seq.. On May 21, 2012, the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation, that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied and part, and that plaintiff be granted leave to file a second amended complaint. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Therefore it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Plaintiff's claims for damages against the individual defendants in both their individual and official capacities under the Americans with Disabilities Act are DISMISSED; 3. Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief against the individual defendants in their official capacities REMAIN; 4. Plaintiff's remaining claims as to defendants Quinn, Minal, Torres, and Washer are DISMISSED without prejudice to allow amendment as directed below; -2- 5. Plaintiff's claim against Nurse Ted is DISMISSED; and 6. Plaintiff is granted until July 20, 2012, to file a second amended complaint to assert causes of action for (a) the use of excessive force in violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, (b) retaliation for filing complaints and grievances in violation of his First Amendment right to seek the redress of grievances, and (c) failing to protect Phelan from harm posed by other inmates in violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 19, 2012 Utica, New York. -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.