Haggas v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 6:2017cv00636 - Document 24 (N.D.N.Y 2018)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security's decision is AFFIRMED; and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 8/22/2018. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(jlb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Haggas v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------CORINNE T. HAGGAS, Plaintiff, -v- 6:17-CV-636 (DNH/WBC) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: CORINNE T. HAGGAS Plaintiff, pro se 62 Moreland Street Little Falls, NY 13365 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Attorneys for Defendant Office of Regional General Counsel Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, NY 10278 FERGUS J. KAISER, ESQ. Special Ass't U.S. Attorney DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff Corinne T. Haggas filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for benefits under the Social Security Act. By Report-Recommendation dated May 7, 2018, the Honorable W illiam B. Mitchell Carter, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Commissioner of Social Dockets.Justia.com Security's decision be affirmed and that the complaint be dismissed. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. The Commissioner of Social Security's decision is AFFIRMED; and 2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 22, 2018 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
