Datiz v. International Recovery Associates, Inc., No. 2:2015cv03549 - Document 129 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER: On November 30, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a motion for attorneys fees and costs 113 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3).The Court hereby refers this matter to United States Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlins on for a recommendation as to whether the motion for attorneys fees should be granted, and if so, what the award should be. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to note the referral. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 4/29/2019. (Coleman, Laurie)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Datiz v. International Recovery Associates, Inc. Doc. 129 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------X LISA DATIZ, Plaintiff, FILED CLERK 1:42 pm, Apr 29, 2019 U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LONG ISLAND OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER 2:15-cv-03549 (ADS)(AKT) -againstINTERNATIONAL RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, INC. Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------X SPATT, District Judge: On June 17, 2015, plaintiff Lisa Datiz (the “Plaintiff”) brought the instant action alleging that defendant International Recover Associates (the “Defendant”) violated various provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (“FDCPA”). On September 24, 2018, the Court granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. On November 30, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3). The Court hereby refers this matter to United States Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson for a recommendation as to whether the motion for attorney’s fees should be granted, and if so, what the award should be. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to note the referral. 1 Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. Dated: Central Islip, New York April 29, 2019 __/s/ Arthur D. Spatt____ ARTHUR D. SPATT United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
