Romano v. Kardashian et al, No. 9:2012cv00109 - Document 4 (D. Mont. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 in full. Plaintiff Romano's application to proceed informa pauperis 1 is DENIED, and this matter is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 6/28/2012. Mailed to Romano. (TAG, )

Download PDF
Romano v. Kardashian et al Doc. 4 FILED JUN 2 8 20\2 PATRICK E. DUFFY. CLERK By DEPUTY CLERK. MISSO\JI.A IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION GINO ROMANO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) KIM KARDASHIAN, LINDSAY LORAN, ) KOURTNEY KARDASHIAN, KHLOE ) KARDASHIAN, and LAMAR ODOM, ) ) Defendants. ) CV 12-109-M-DLC-JCL . ORDER --------------------------) On June 22, 2012, Plaintiff Gino Romano applied to proceed informa pauperis with this action. His proposed Complaint makes the unbelievable allegation that he was injured in a physical confrontation with a cabal of drugdealing celebrities in the parking lot of a CVS store in Missoula, Montana. -1­ Dockets.Justia.com United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch recommends denial of Plaintiff Romano's application to proceed injormapauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), which authorizes a court to dismiss an injorma pauperis proceeding at any time ifthe action is frivolous or malicious. Judge Lynch explains that "Gino Romano" is an alias of serial litigator Jonathan Lee Riches, and he notes that the instant proposed Complaint is similar to 19 other lawsuits filed in various federal district courts under the "Gino Romano" pseudonym during this month. Because of the frivolous nature of the proposed Complaint, Judge Lynch recommends denial of the application to proceed injormapauperis and dismissal of the case. This Court reviews the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). The Court can find no clear error with Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. No.3) and therefore adopts them in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Romano's application to proceed injorma pauperis (Doc. No.1) is DENIED, and this matter is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Clerk of Court is -2­ directed to enter a judgment of dismissal and to close the case file. DATED this .m.~ay ofJune, 2012. Dana L. Christensen, '-""".w", United States District Court -3­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.