1955 Western District of Missouri US Federal District Court Case Law

United States v. Maxwell
Date: December 15, 1955
Citation: 137 F. Supp. 298
Docket Number: 19346
Rosenfeld v. Continental Building Operating Company
Date: November 9, 1955
Citation: 135 F. Supp. 465
Docket Number: 9351
United States v. Columbia Erection Corp.
Date: October 3, 1955
Citation: 134 F. Supp. 305
Docket Number: 9391
Southern Kansas Greyhound Lines v. United States
Date: October 3, 1955
Citation: 134 F. Supp. 502
Docket Number: 9695
Wiles v. Union Wire Rope Corporation
Date: October 3, 1955
Citation: 134 F. Supp. 299
Docket Number: 9875
United States v. Harris
Date: August 24, 1955
Citation: 133 F. Supp. 796
Docket Number: 18004
Western Newspaper Union v. Woodward
Date: August 8, 1955
Citation: 133 F. Supp. 17
Docket Number: 9617
Thurston v. Hobby
Date: July 25, 1955
Citation: 133 F. Supp. 205
Docket Number: 8912
Mahony v. Witt Ice and Gas Company
Date: June 3, 1955
Citation: 131 F. Supp. 564
Docket Number: 9702
Stamm v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
Date: April 19, 1955
Citation: 129 F. Supp. 719
Docket Number: 9645
Davis v. University of Kansas City
Date: April 15, 1955
Citation: 129 F. Supp. 716
Collins v. Public Service Commission of Missouri
Date: April 9, 1955
Citation: 129 F. Supp. 722
Docket Number: 530
General Electric Co. v. Central Transit Warehouse Co.
Date: February 14, 1955
Citation: 127 F. Supp. 817
Docket Number: 9387
CS Foreman Company v. HB Zachry Company
Date: January 22, 1955
Citation: 127 F. Supp. 901
Docket Number: 9110
Carter v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation
Date: January 19, 1955
Citation: 127 F. Supp. 675
Docket Number: 7940
Pucci v. BLATZ BREWING COMPANY
Date: January 17, 1955
Citation: 127 F. Supp. 747
Docket Number: 9361
Wessing v. American Indemnity Co. of Galveston, Tex.
Date: January 13, 1955
Citation: 127 F. Supp. 775
Docket Numbers: 526, 527
Lock Joint Pipe Company v. Anderson
Date: January 10, 1955
Citation: 127 F. Supp. 692
Docket Number: 9504

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.