First State Bank v. Lloyd's Underwriters, et al, No. 4:2003cv00156 - Document 118 (E.D. Mo. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Warren Spielman's latest correspondence [#117] is construed as a motion challenging the judgment previously entered in this case, and is denied for the same reason I denied the previous motion this Court has no authority, jurisdiction, or ability to change or modify the final judgment more than four years after it was entered. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 3/5/09. (RJD)

Download PDF
First State Bank v. Lloyd's Underwriters, et al Doc. 118 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION FIRST STATE BANK of ST. CHARLES, Plaintiff, vs. VENETIAN HARBOR, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:03CV156 CDP ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Warren Spielman’s latest correspondence [#117] is construed as a motion challenging the judgment previously entered in this case, and is denied for the same reason I denied the previous motion – this Court has no authority, jurisdiction, or ability to change or modify the final judgment more than four years after it was entered. _______________________________ CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 5th day of March, 2009. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.