Watson et al v. Witty et al, No. 2:2016cv00071 - Document 396 (E.D. Mo. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs demand for compensatory damages in the amount of $1.00 is granted. Plaintiffs demand for punitive damages remains. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for injunctive relief is denied at this time, as this motion is not the appropriate pleading to seek injunctive relief.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 12/8/2020. (AAT)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Watson et al v. Witty et al Doc. 396 Case: 2:16-cv-00071-HEA Doc. #: 396 Filed: 12/08/20 Page: 1 of 1 PageID #: 3152 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION TERRY G. WATSON, Plaintiff, v. KAREY L. WITTY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:16CV71 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Reduction of Compensatory Demand, [Doc. No. 395]. Defendants have not responded to the Motion. Plaintiff also seeks injunctive relief. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s demand for compensatory damages in the amount of $1.00 is granted. Plaintiff’s demand for punitive damages remains. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief is denied at this time, as this motion is not the appropriate pleading to seek injunctive relief. Dated this 8th day of December 2020. ___________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
