Turner v. Tillman et al, No. 1:2019cv00004 - Document 2 (E.D. Mo. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Prisoner Cases form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pay the $4 00 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also submit a certified copy of his inmate account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed, the dismissal will not constitute a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Response to Court due by 2/13/2019. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/14/19. (CSG)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Turner v. Tillman et al Doc. 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION ALAN D. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN TILLMAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:19CV4 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff Alan D. Turner’s pro se complaint. Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with an inmate account statement. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis – Prisoner Cases form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pay the $400 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also submit a certified copy of his inmate account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed, the dismissal will not constitute a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Dated this 14th day of January, 2019 ___________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
