Wilson et al v. The City of Greenville, Mississippi et al, No. 4:2022cv00064 - Document 72 (N.D. Miss. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 10/24/23. (jla)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wilson et al v. The City of Greenville, Mississippi et al Doc. 72 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 1 of 22 PageID #: 1042 Dockets.Justia.com Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 2 of 22 PageID #: 1043 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 3 of 22 PageID #: 1044 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 4 of 22 PageID #: 1045 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 5 of 22 PageID #: 1046 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 6 of 22 PageID #: 1047 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 7 of 22 PageID #: 1048 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 8 of 22 PageID #: 1049 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 9 of 22 PageID #: 1050 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 10 of 22 PageID #: 1051 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 11 of 22 PageID #: 1052 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 12 of 22 PageID #: 1053 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 13 of 22 PageID #: 1054 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 14 of 22 PageID #: 1055 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 15 of 22 PageID #: 1056 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 16 of 22 PageID #: 1057 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 17 of 22 PageID #: 1058 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 18 of 22 PageID #: 1059 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 19 of 22 PageID #: 1060 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 20 of 22 PageID #: 1061 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 21 of 22 PageID #: 1062 Case: 4:22-cv-00064-GHD-DAS Doc #: 72 Filed: 10/25/23 22 of 22 PageID #: 1063
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
