Damond v. State Of Louisiana et al, No. 3:2020cv00437 - Document 13 (M.D. La. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting 9 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims, and that this action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 9/28/2020. (EDC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Damond v. State Of Louisiana et al Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GLENN DAMOND (#1200123529) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-437-JWD-RLB STATE OF LOUISIANA, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc.9) dated September 3, 2020, to which an objection was filed (Doc. 11); IT IS ORDERED that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims, and that this action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A.1 Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on September 28, 2020. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 The plaintiff is advised that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that, “In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section [Proceedings in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
