Cockerham v. Kent et al, No. 3:2019cv00013 - Document 36 (M.D. La. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting 34 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge; granting in part 30 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims asserted against Defendant in his official capacity for monetary damages are dismissed, with prejudice. In all other regards, the Motion is denied, and this matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/21/2021. (SWE)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cockerham v. Kent et al Doc. 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KELLY B. COCKERHAM (#344342) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 19-13-JWD-SDJ DR. HAL MACMURDO OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 34) dated March 24, 2021, to which no objection was filed, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30) is granted, in part, and Plaintiff’s claims asserted against Defendant in his official capacity for monetary damages are dismissed, with prejudice. In all other regards, the Motion is denied, and this matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings herein. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 21, 2021. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
