Rios v. Grifols Biomat USA, No. 3:2018cv00814 - Document 67 (M.D. La. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting 65 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge; granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Dismiss and that Plaintiff's claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and her parallel claim s under the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law, La. R.S. 23:301, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 8/19/2020. (EDC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rios v. Grifols Biomat USA Doc. 67 Case 3:18-cv-00814-JWD-RLB Document 67 08/19/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MICHELLE RIOS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 18-814-JWD-RLB GRIFOLS BIOMAT USA OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated July 17, 2020 (Doc. 65), to which an objection was filed (Doc. 66); IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Renewed Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended and Second Amended Complaints (R. Doc. 60) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and that Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and her parallel claims under the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law, La. R.S. 23:301, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, as more fully set forth herein. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on August 19, 2020. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
