Ancar v. LeBlanc et al, No. 3:2017cv00913 - Document 83 (M.D. La. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting 81 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge.The 67 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, in part, dismissing plaintiff's claims with prejudice except the plaintiff's claim asserted against defendants Boe ker and Vittorio regarding standing water in the shower. The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in connection with the plaintiff's potential state law claims. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. for further proceedings. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/22/2019. (SGO)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ancar v. LeBlanc et al Doc. 83 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALLEN ANCAR (#299054) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 17-913-JWD-RLB JAMES LEBLANC, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated April 2, 2019, (Doc. 81), to which an opposition was filed (Doc. 82); IT IS ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 67) is granted, in part, dismissing plaintiff’s claims with prejudice except the plaintiff’s claim asserted against defendants Boeker and Vittorio regarding standing water in the shower. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in connection with the plaintiff’s potential state law claims. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. for further proceedings. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 22, 2019. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
