Fritz v. Cain et al, No. 3:2013cv00556 - Document 57 (M.D. La. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION Adopting 56 the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge: (1) The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part, dismissing any claims made on behalf of other prisoners and any other claim asserted in h is Complaint except for his deliberate medical indifference claim against the defendants based on the failure to timely provide him with hernia surgery, and denying the remainder of the defendants' motion; (2) the Plaintiffs Motion for Su mmary Judgment is denied; (3) the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims and these claims are dismissed without prejudice; and, (4) this action is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings on the plaintiffs Eighth Amendment deliberate medical indifference claim. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 2/20/2015. (JDL)

Download PDF
Fritz v. Cain et al Doc. 57 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.