Henderson v. Turner et al, No. 3:2011cv00039 - Document 174 (M.D. La. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS granting 161 Motion in Limine regarding causation. Signed by Judge Helen Ginger Berrigan on 02/05/2013. (kac)

Download PDF
Henderson v. Turner et al Doc. 174 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LATESHA HENDERSON, ET AL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-39 MAJOR JOE TURNER, ET AL SECTION: "C" (4) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion in limine regarding causation. Rec. doc. 161. Defendants oppose the motion. Rec. Doc. 166. Having reviewed the record, memoranda of counsel, and the law, the motion is GRANTED for the following reasons. In the Court’s previous order (Rec. Doc. 168, p. 1), it limited Dr. Tarver’s testimony to that of a fact witness with “opinions rationally based on his perceptions” not “based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge . . . .” FRE 701. Dr. Tarver may testify regarding what he observed on the day of Mr. Dawkins’ death, including his assessment of the cause of death. Dr. Tarver is not to be asked, nor is he to give, any opinion regarding whether Dawkins was compliant or not with his recommended treatments. The Court has previously ruled that recovery for civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are not subject to diminution resulting from comparative fault. Burge v. Parish of St. Tammany, 1995 WL 317125 at *3 (E.D. La.). Rec. Doc. 111, p. 4. The Court previously DENIED plaintiff’s motion in limine to find Dr. Tarver’s Dockets.Justia.com Interoffice Memorandum, Medical Department inadmissible as hearsay. Rec. Doc. 168. However, in reviewing this motion, the Court now finds that while the Interoffice Memorandum, Medical Department, Rec. Doc. 161, Exh. A, “Defendant’s Expert Report,” should not be excluded as hearsay, it is excluded as unduly prejudicial. FRE 403. The report references Dawkins as “noncompliant” with recommended treatment. Rec. Doc. 161, Exh. A, p. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Rec. Doc. 161. New Orleans, Louisiana this 6th day of February, 2013. ______________________________ HELEN G. BERRIGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.