Cox v. Environmental Analytics, Inc. et al, No. 3:2009cv00237 - Document 98 (M.D. La. 2010)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that a final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendant and against plaintiff, dismissing all claims against defendant, with prejudice, at plaintiffs costs. Costs allowed under 28 U.S.C. §1920 shall be taxed by the clerk of court in favor of defendant and against plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of LR 54.3M.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 8/18/2010. (CMM, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cox v. Environmental Analytics, Inc. et al Doc. 98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM TROY COX, SR. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NUMBER 09-237-DLD ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICS, INC. JUDGMENT This matter came for trial by jury beginning August 10, 2010. Present in court were Jean-Paul Robert, Sr. and Joseph J. Long on behalf of plaintiff and Joseph P. Brantley, IV, Samuel Bradley Rhorer, and Julie J. Baxter on behalf of defendant. The case having been duly tried by a jury, and on the basis of the verdict returned by the jury on August 12, 2010 (rec. doc. 97); IT IS ORDERED that a final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendant and against plaintiff, dismissing all claims against defendant, with prejudice, at plaintiff’s costs. Costs allowed under 28 U.S.C. §1920 shall be taxed by the clerk of court in favor of defendant and against plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of LR 54.3M. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on August 18, 2010. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DOCIA L. DALBY Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
